US News | Anti-discrimination Requirements During the PERM Recruitment Process
Wednesday 20 March 2024
The fundamental basis of the full PERM process is to establish that a foreign worker will not displace a US worker for the position being offered. The PERM process has three distinctive phases. This article will focus on the second step: good faith Recruitment, which is the process by which an employer is required to conduct a good faith effort to test the US Job Market by placing advertisements for the PERM position and certify that no able, willing, and qualified US worker is available.
Regulations state that an employer must place 3 specific types of advertisements – also known as mandatory PERM recruitment:
- Job Order with the state’s workforce agency;
- 2 Sunday Ads in a newspaper of general circulation appropriate to the employment; and
- Notice of Filing – which is to inform other employees that a labor certification will be filed.
In addition to the mandatory recruitment, employers are required to provide an additional 3 of the 10 other ways of recruitment:
- Company’s website
- Job search website
- Local or ethnic newspaper
- Radio and/or TV advertisement
- Employee referral program
- Job fair
- On-campus recruiting at a local college
- Campus placement office of a local college
- Trade/professional organization
- Private employment firm
In the case between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Apple, Inc. (Apple), the DOJ claimed that Apple violated anti-discriminatory provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) whereby Apple engaged in a pattern of discrimination during their recruitment efforts through the PERM. DOJ claimed that Apple used less effective recruitment practices and deterred potential qualified US applicants from applying to position(s) that Apple preferred for their foreign workers. Specifically, 1) Apple did not advertise the PERM positions on their external job website, although it was standard practice; 2) it required PERM applicants to submit paper applications although the company allowed electronic applications for all other positions. The DOJ stated that these less effective procedures deterred and limited the scope of potential qualified U.S. applicants. Apple settled for $25M.
The settlement signals a shift in enforcement, urging companies to align their PERM processes accordingly based on these new trends. The case suggested no indication that employees with approved PERM labor certifications will be impacted by the shift in government enforcement. However, pending PERM applications could potentially be affected through audited cases.
Get in touch
Contact Laura Devine Attorneys to learn more about the PERM process or enquiries@lauradevine.com.

Jane Lee
Senior Associate

Dilif Beyazit
Senior Paralegal
Latest Insights
30 April 2025
US immigration update: What you need to know about the Alien Registration Act in 2025
Long-standing US legislation called Alien Registration Act (also known at the Smith Act) requires most noncitizens aged 14 or older who remain in the…
23 April 2025
Updating eVisas – new sanctions introduced
Many overseas nationals now have an eVisa, a digital UK immigration status, replacing the former physical Biometric Residence Permit (BRP). This can…
10 April 2025
Change in thresholds for sponsor company size classification from 6 April 2025
On 6 April 2025 the criteria used to define small companies under the Companies Act 2006 changed, impacting relevant companies responsible for paying…